New personal electronic devices age poorly, and obsolescence is built-in. The hottest new smart-phones enjoy a comparatively short life-span, and soon join the old CD players, miniature flip-phones, and big, boxy-looking PCs that are relegated to the attic or garage. Each consumer generates around twenty pounds of electronic garbage each year on average, and Dallas e-waste processing helps them recycle the old units responsibly.
It is no secret that many electronic components include toxins. Prior to flat screen displays, bulky cathode ray tubes needed barium, a toxic metallic element also necessary for some automobile parts and lighting elements. Circuit boards often contain cadmium, harmful to kidneys and bones. Lead, chromium, and mercury are also common in used electronics, usually surrounded by structural plastic that neither burns nor decomposes.
The public is well-informed about the need for recycling, but that awareness has had little impact on the growing presence of e-waste. It is common for manufacturing companies to have no officially expressed policy regarding ultimate disposal, and even environmentally progressive bodies such as the European Union can account for less than one quarter of the electronic garbage generated. United States figures go even lower, and much of that is exported for metal extraction.
In an idealized economic world, electronics manufacturers would take responsibility for recycling what they produce, and in some cases that is actually occurring. In Texas and some other states, television and computer makers are required to offer free-of-charge services for their customers, and to publicize those efforts. Although many companies are eager to participate, others insist that the problem is demand, not supply.
Even the most environmentally-aware consumers may not be able to discover the real destination of their recyclables. A growing number of services provide free pickup, mass collection rallies or events are popular, and a growing number of charitable organizations solicit old equipment for re-purposing. Much of the material has traditionally ended up in poorer countries with their own e-waste issues, including worker exposure to toxins.
Once the garbage has been removed, there are few real assurances that it will not end up becoming part of a greater problem. Some receiving countries face such extreme poverty that they willingly trade environmental degradation in exchange for hard currency. In wealthier nations, local recycling programs that are the least costly to operate over time may not be the best long-term solution.
Some electronics makers are seeking meaningful certification by local, independent environmental agencies. In many states there are already substantial fines for flaunting regulations, but no national laws uniformly regulate electronic waste processing. It has become extremely easy for people to have their old electronics taken away, but very hard to determine their final destination.
People residing in Austin increasingly choose a recycling company that is willing to openly explain how the disposal process works, and whether the material is being internationally transported. Some firms have adopted tracking systems that follow individual shipments closely, including the final destination. This not only helps control environmental pollution, but also offers better protections for workers involved in the recycling effort.
It is no secret that many electronic components include toxins. Prior to flat screen displays, bulky cathode ray tubes needed barium, a toxic metallic element also necessary for some automobile parts and lighting elements. Circuit boards often contain cadmium, harmful to kidneys and bones. Lead, chromium, and mercury are also common in used electronics, usually surrounded by structural plastic that neither burns nor decomposes.
The public is well-informed about the need for recycling, but that awareness has had little impact on the growing presence of e-waste. It is common for manufacturing companies to have no officially expressed policy regarding ultimate disposal, and even environmentally progressive bodies such as the European Union can account for less than one quarter of the electronic garbage generated. United States figures go even lower, and much of that is exported for metal extraction.
In an idealized economic world, electronics manufacturers would take responsibility for recycling what they produce, and in some cases that is actually occurring. In Texas and some other states, television and computer makers are required to offer free-of-charge services for their customers, and to publicize those efforts. Although many companies are eager to participate, others insist that the problem is demand, not supply.
Even the most environmentally-aware consumers may not be able to discover the real destination of their recyclables. A growing number of services provide free pickup, mass collection rallies or events are popular, and a growing number of charitable organizations solicit old equipment for re-purposing. Much of the material has traditionally ended up in poorer countries with their own e-waste issues, including worker exposure to toxins.
Once the garbage has been removed, there are few real assurances that it will not end up becoming part of a greater problem. Some receiving countries face such extreme poverty that they willingly trade environmental degradation in exchange for hard currency. In wealthier nations, local recycling programs that are the least costly to operate over time may not be the best long-term solution.
Some electronics makers are seeking meaningful certification by local, independent environmental agencies. In many states there are already substantial fines for flaunting regulations, but no national laws uniformly regulate electronic waste processing. It has become extremely easy for people to have their old electronics taken away, but very hard to determine their final destination.
People residing in Austin increasingly choose a recycling company that is willing to openly explain how the disposal process works, and whether the material is being internationally transported. Some firms have adopted tracking systems that follow individual shipments closely, including the final destination. This not only helps control environmental pollution, but also offers better protections for workers involved in the recycling effort.
About the Author:
Read more about How Dallas E-Waste Processing Centers Are Combating A Growing Problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment